Anthropic breaks with the industry group that oppos…

Image: METAL

Summary

Axios reported on September 8 that Anthropic is severing ties with the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).
The reason is ITI's opposition to three bills, the AI Overwatch Act, the Chip Security Act, and the MATCH Act, all of which Anthropic supports.
Google, OpenAI, and NVIDIA remain members of the group, and the Senate returns on September 14 to take up the defense authorization bill.

Anthropic is cutting ties with the Information Technology Industry Council, the US tech industry's lobbying group. Citing a person familiar with the matter, Axios reported on September 8 that Anthropic ended its membership after the group opposed three bills on advanced semiconductor export controls.

To put it simply, ITI is a group that tech companies such as Google, OpenAI, and NVIDIA pay dues to so that it speaks for their positions in Washington. When a member company breaks with the group, it is saying publicly that the group's position differs from the company's own thinking.

The break comes over three bills: the AI Overwatch Act, the Chip Security Act, and the MATCH Act, all of which aim to keep the most advanced US semiconductors and semiconductor equipment from flowing to the Chinese military and Chinese AI labs. Anthropic supports all three, while ITI has opposed them on the grounds that they weaken the US technology ecosystem.

The bills point in different directions. The AI Overwatch Act would give Congress oversight of overseas sales of advanced AI chips, the Chip Security Act would require mechanisms to verify where exported chips are located, and the MATCH Act would align export control standards with allied countries. What they share is the intent to track semiconductors after they leave the United States.

ITI's position is clear. A spokesperson for the group told Axios that its member companies agree that these bills harm the US technology stack. Given that Google, OpenAI, and NVIDIA are members of the group, Anthropic stands alone on the other side.

This is not the first time. Anthropic has already parted ways with OpenAI and Google over AI safety legislation, and in July 2026, when major companies issued a letter supporting open-weight models, it was the only large company that did not sign directly. In June it also went through a partial halt to offering its top-tier model under a US government export control order.

The timing stands out too. The US Senate returns on September 14 to take up the National Defense Authorization Act, and the three bills have the backing of conservative groups such as Heritage Action and American Compass. Ahead of the votes, Anthropic has made clear in advance that it stands apart from the industry group.

Behind this choice is the company's position. Anthropic supplies frontier models to the US government, and it regards Chinese AI labs building models of its own caliber on US chips as a risk to both its business and safety. If it judges that the industry group's joint position increases that risk, leaving the group is the cheaper option for the company.

The reason Korea's semiconductor industry should read this news lies in the content of the bills. If the three pass, the path for US equipment and chips into China narrows further, and Korean companies' calculations about that market change with it. An AI company demanding tougher semiconductor regulation is a lineup that did not exist just a few years ago.

The news is also one piece of the AI policy map in Washington. While OpenAI and Google often stand on the side of slowing regulation, Anthropic has kept standing on the opposite side on safety bills and export controls, and this withdrawal reconfirms that position with money, in the form of dues. It walked out of one lobbying group, but which side this company will push legislation from has become clearer.

In the end, Anthropic has shown, by cutting off its dues, that it is a company that puts its own safety policy ahead of the industry's joint position. OpenAI, Google, and NVIDIA, which remain in the group, now each have to answer for themselves on those three bills, and September 14, when the Senate convenes, is the deadline for that answer.