Automated Summarization of Financial News Using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation: An Early Empirical Study (Fall 2023)
Testing AI summaries of stock news, the simple approach beat the trendy retrieval-based one
This Fall 2023 project at George Washington University built a system pulling news, Wikipedia background, and stock prices for ten major companies, then used LLMs to summarize it all. A straightforward 'Summarize Chains' approach with the open-source Falcon-7B model gave the most accurate and coherent results, while Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), now a popular technique, caused repetition and made up facts. Converting raw stock numbers into plain-language sentences before feeding them to GPT also avoided calculation errors entirely.
What they did
- Built a data pipeline for ten companies (AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, META, TSLA, JPM, NVDA, WMT, DIS) pulling from News API, Wikipedia, and Yahoo Finance
- Solved the problem of LLMs struggling with numerical tables by pre-computing percentage changes in Python and converting them into sentences like 'TSLA closed at 261.16, up 5.93%'
- Compared two summarization methods, Summarize Chains and RAG with FAISS, across three open-source models (Falcon-7B, DistilBART, BART-Large) for news summarization
- Falcon-7B with Summarize Chains covered all three Google-related news events accurately and coherently, while RAG caused Falcon to repeat the same content 60+ times and caused BART-Large to hallucinate incorrect facts
- Both LLM-based summarization methods beat a simple Lead-3 baseline (just taking the first three sentences) on the ROUGE-1 metric
| Company (Ticker) | News Articles | Wikipedia Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Apple (AAPL) | ≈97 | Yes |
| Microsoft (MSFT) | ≈85 | Yes |
| Alphabet (GOOGL) | ≈112 | Yes |
| Amazon (AMZN) | ≈78 | Yes |
| Meta (META/FB) | ≈91 | Yes |
| Tesla (TSLA) | ≈103 | Yes |
| JPMorgan (JPM) | ≈64 | Yes |
| NVIDIA (NVDA) | ≈88 | Yes |
| Walmart (WMT) | ≈52 | Yes |
| Disney (DIS) | ≈67 | Yes |
| Total | ≈837 | 10 |
| Model | Type | Access | Task |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT (text-davinci-003) | Proprietary (OpenAI) | API | Stock data |
| Falcon-7B-Instruct | Open-source (TII) | HuggingFace Hub | News |
| DistilBART-CNN-12-6 | Open-source (sshleifer) | HuggingFace Hub | News |
| BART-Large-XSum-SAMSum | Open-source (AdamCodd) | HuggingFace Hub | News |
| Model | Approach | ROUGE-1 | ROUGE-2 | ROUGE-L |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DistilBART | Summarize Chains | 0.4000 | 0.3456 | 0.2254 |
| DistilBART | RAG | 0.2523 | 0.1813 | 0.1201 |
| Falcon-7B | Summarize Chains | 0.3361 | 0.1828 | 0.1708 |
| Falcon-7B | RAG | 0.2281 | 0.1118 | 0.1579 |
| BART-Large | Summarize Chains | 0.2604 | 0.1786 | 0.2012 |
| BART-Large | RAG | 0.2553 | 0.1835 | 0.1459 |
| Lead-3 Baseline | Extractive | 0.2812 | 0.1943 | 0.1654 |
| Company | ROUGE-1 | ROUGE-2 | ROUGE-L |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 0.4348 | 0.2206 | 0.2754 |
| MSFT | 0.4306 | 0.1972 | 0.2639 |
| GOOGL | 0.3269 | 0.0980 | 0.2885 |
| TSLA | 0.2913 | 0.0990 | 0.1942 |
| AMZN | 0.5098 | 0.3600 | 0.4902 |
| META | 0.2435 | 0.0531 | 0.1565 |
| Mean | 0.3728 | 0.1713 | 0.2781 |
| Model | Approach | Coverage | Accuracy | Coherence | Key Issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falcon-7B | Chains | 3/3 | ✓ | ✓ | Best overall |
| DistilBART | Chains | 2/3 | ✓ | ✓ | Misses layoffs |
| DistilBART | RAG | 2/3 | ✓ | ✓ | Misses Russia fine |
| BART-Large | Chains | 1/3 | ✓ | × | Truncated output |
| BART-Large | RAG | 2/3 | × | ✓ | Hallucinated entity |
| Falcon-7B | RAG | 3/3 | ✓ | × | 60× repetition |
Why it matters
The study shows RAG is not a universal fix and can push smaller models toward inventing facts when retrieved passages get mixed up, a risk that matters for accuracy-critical domains like finance. It's a practical reminder that simpler, well-matched methods can outperform trendier techniques for real-world deployment.
Terms in this paper
- LLM (Large Language Model) · an AI model trained on large amounts of text that can generate human-like writing
- RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) · a method where relevant text is fetched first, then used as context for the AI to generate an answer
- Summarize Chains · a method that summarizes document chunks individually, then combines those partial summaries into one final summary
- hallucination · when an AI generates plausible-sounding but false information
- ROUGE score · an automatic metric measuring how much word overlap a generated summary has with a reference text
- FAISS · a similarity search library built by Meta for quickly finding related text passages
Original abstract (English)
Stock market analysts and investors face a daily challenge: too much financial news, too little time. Manually reading and synthesizing hundreds of company-specific articles is impractical, yet missing key information can directly affect investment decisions. This project, conducted at George Washington University in Fall 2023, explores whether Large Language Models can automate this process reliably. We built a pipeline that pulls news articles from the News API, company background from Wikipedia, and stock price data from Yahoo Finance for ten major companies (AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AMZN, META, TSLA, JPM, NVDA, WMT, DIS). Because LLMs cannot directly process numerical tables, we developed a simple but effective template that converts stock data into natural language narratives. We then tested two summarization approaches (Summarize Chains and Retrieval-Augmented Generation with FAISS) across three open-source models (Falcon-7B-Instruct, DistilBART-CNN-12-6, BART-Large-XSum) for news, and GPT (text-davinci-003) for stock summaries. Falcon-7B with Summarize Chains gave the best results, covering all news events accurately and coherently. RAG, while promising in theory, caused severe repetition in Falcon and hallucinated facts in BART-Large when k was large. Both LLM-based approaches outperformed a simple Lead-3 baseline on ROUGE-1. We also built a Streamlit dashboard for interactive stock visualization. The work was done in Fall 2023, before RAG-based financial tools became widespread, and the failure modes we document, particularly hallucination under RAG in smaller models, remain relevant today.
Read on arXivLatest papers
- Specification-delta-driven data governance: an empirical study of the {\guillemotleft}spec-delta{\guillemotright} as the unit of change in lakehouse data platformsTreating data-platform changes like reviewable spec snippets instead of code diffs: an experiment design paper
- Are LLMs becoming similarly creative? Evidence from three years of modelsNewer AI chatbots are giving increasingly similar answers to each other, three years of data show
- Auditing Cross-Lingual Fairness in Language Model WatermarkingAI text watermarks that are supposed to catch machine-written content work far less reliably in many non-English languages, and the gap tracks language families, not individual languages
- TESTNAV: Pareto-Guided Search for Compositional Robustness TestingA smarter way to test AI models against combined real-world glitches, without checking every possible combination
- Optimal Skill Selection for LLM Agents with Provable Bicriteria GuaranteesA method that picks which 'skill documents' to feed an AI coding agent, with mathematically guaranteed near-optimal results
- Reliable Financial Named Entity Recognition under Domain ShiftAn AI's confidence trained on formal filings turns unreliable once it reads tweets
- FlashPrefill V2: Block-Sparse Prefill Attention for Long-Context LLM ServingMaking sparse attention fast enough and accurate enough for real LLM serving, not just papers
- Robust Incomplete Multimodal Sentiment Analysis via Iterative Proxy CorrectionWhen text input is missing or broken, this AI doesn't guess once and move on—it revises its guess step by step to read emotions more reliably
Latest from METAL LAB
- Google Discover adds chatbot that adjusts your feed based on spoken preferences
- OpenAI Closes In on Anthropic Again in Enterprise Spending Share
- Meta Unveils First 10 Tasks in WildArtifactBench, a Benchmark for AI Agents
- Musk: "Optimus + Grok will one day handle healthcare for all humanity"
- 35% of Web Pages Published Since ChatGPT Show Signs of AI Authorship