One email each morning — yesterday's AI, sortedGet it in your inbox

METAL LAB

Robust Incomplete Multimodal Sentiment Analysis via Iterative Proxy Correction

arXiv:2608.199712026-08-21

When text input is missing or broken, this AI doesn't guess once and move on—it revises its guess step by step to read emotions more reliably

Real-world multimodal sentiment analysis often has to work with incomplete or corrupted speech, video, or text, which hurts accuracy. Prior methods built a one-time 'proxy' to stand in for missing text and used it immediately, letting early mistakes propagate through the whole system. This paper instead refines the proxy gradually over multiple steps before using it, achieving consistently better and more stable results than the strongest prior baseline LNLN across the MOSI, MOSEI, and SIMS benchmarks.

What they did

  1. Problem: real-world text, audio, and video inputs are often missing or noisy, which degrades existing sentiment-analysis models
  2. Limitation of prior work: when text is degraded, models build a 'proxy' from audio/visual cues to stand in for it, but they generate this proxy only once and inject it immediately, letting initial errors propagate
  3. Proposed approach: the proxy is first built only from non-language (audio/visual) signals, then refined over multiple steps using a gated residual correction mechanism
  4. The refined proxy is then adaptively blended with the observed language representation based on an estimated reliability score for that text
  5. During training, the complete (undamaged) language representation is used as a semantic anchor to guide each refinement step in the right direction
  6. Result: on MOSI, MOSEI, and SIMS, the method matches or beats the strongest baseline LNLN overall, and degrades more gracefully as more input is missing
Fig. 1: Comparison between existing proxy-based methods and our iterative proxy correction method.
Fig. 1: Comparison between existing proxy-based methods and our iterative proxy correction method.
TABLE I: Results on the MOSI and MOSEI datasets (baseline results from LNLN [19]).
MethodMOSIMOSEI
Acc-7Acc-5Acc-2F1MAECorrAcc-7Acc-5Acc-2F1MAECorr
MISA29.8533.0871.49/70.0071.28/70.331.0850.52440.8439.3971.27/75.8263.85/68.730.7800.503
Self-MM29.5534.6770.51/69.2666.60/67.541.0700.51244.7045.3873.89/77.4268.92/72.310.6950.498
MMIM31.3033.7769.14/67.0666.65/64.041.0770.50740.7541.7473.32/75.8968.72/70.320.7390.489
CENET30.3837.2571.46/67.7368.41/64.851.0800.50447.1847.8374.67/77.3470.68/74.080.6850.535
TETFN30.3034.3469.76/67.6865.69/63.291.0870.50740.3047.7069.76/67.6865.69/63.291.0870.508
ALMT30.3033.4270.40/68.3972.57/71.801.0830.49840.9241.6476.64/77.5477.14/78.030.6740.481
LNLN34.2638.2772.55/70.9472.73/71.251.0460.52745.4246.1776.30/78.1977.77/79.950.6920.530
Ours34.5238.5573.27/71.9373.03/71.931.0460.53247.1047.9478.20/78.9478.46/80.000.6640.595
Fig. 2: Overall architecture of the proposed method.
Fig. 2: Overall architecture of the proposed method.
TABLE II: Results on the SIMS dataset (baseline results from LNLN [19]).
MethodAcc-5Acc-3Acc-2F1MAECorr
MISA31.5356.8772.7166.300.5390.348
Self-MM32.2856.7572.8168.430.5080.376
MMIM31.8152.7669.8666.210.5440.339
CENET22.2953.1768.1357.900.5890.107
TETFN33.4256.9173.5868.670.5050.387
ALMT20.0045.3669.6672.760.5610.364
LNLN34.6457.1472.7379.430.5140.397
Ours35.1358.2873.0576.290.4980.404
Fig. 3: (a)–(c) show the F1 curves on MOSI, MOSEI, and SIMS. (d)–(f) show the MAE curves on MOSI, MOSEI, and SIMS.
Fig. 3: (a)–(c) show the F1 curves on MOSI, MOSEI, and SIMS. (d)–(f) show the MAE curves on MOSI, MOSEI, and SIMS.
TABLE III: Modality ablation results on the MOSI and MOSEI datasets.
MethodMOSIMOSEI
Acc-7Acc-5Acc-2F1MAECorrAcc-7Acc-5Acc-2F1MAECorr
T45.5851.7084.91 / 82.7584.84 / 82.680.7310.79052.3953.8185.75 / 84.4685.7 / 84.140.5480.769
A22.8423.0858.49 / 57.3861.27 / 59.641.3710.28041.3841.3863.84 / 71.2851.85 / 59.930.8300.152
V22.9824.8358.59 / 56.8051.78 / 53.901.3760.23042.4642.4665.30 / 71.0261.06 / 58.990.8110.244
T+A45.5351.3185.16 / 83.1984.97 / 83.070.7390.79052.2953.6885.77 / 84.6585.73 / 84.200.5490.764
T+V45.4051.3184.86 / 82.6084.70 / 82.560.7370.79052.4853.9686.08 / 84.8585.99 / 84.850.5450.768
A+V22.4024.3059.25 / 58.3156.45 / 57.041.3500.19842.5242.5265.38 / 71.2260.40 / 60.120.8120.244
Random34.5238.5573.27/71.9373.03/71.931.0460.53247.1047.9478.20/78.9478.46/80.000.6640.595
Fig. 4: Case study on three MOSI samples. Our method correctly predicts the first two cases where LNLN fails, suggesting its advantage in handling incomplete multimodal cues. Both methods fail on the third case, revealing the difficulty of highly ambiguous samples.
Fig. 4: Case study on three MOSI samples. Our method correctly predicts the first two cases where LNLN fails, suggesting its advantage in handling incomplete multimodal cues. Both methods fail on the third case, revealing the difficulty of highly ambiguous samples.
TABLE IV: Component ablation results on the MOSI and SIMS datasets
MethodMOSISIMS
Acc-7Acc-5Acc-2F1MAECorrAcc-5Acc-3Acc-2F1MAECorr
FULL34.5238.5573.27/71.9373.03/71.931.0460.53235.1358.2873.0576.290.4980.404
w/o Proxy34.5338.5772.29 / 71.8972.29 / 71.841.0530.52730.9354.9870.0562.080.5690.238
w/o Iterative34.2738.3273.19 / 71.8472.37 / 71.691.0510.53630.9855.2370.5869.740.5650.241
w/o ℒc​o​r​r34.2338.2572.37 / 71.2971.48 / 70.451.0510.52931.0555.0370.0962.120.5700.236

Why it matters

Missing or corrupted inputs are common in real deployments due to speech-recognition errors, unstable connections, or privacy restrictions on certain data. Robust sentiment analysis under such conditions matters for call centers, review analysis, and conversational AI systems that need dependable judgments even with imperfect inputs.

Terms in this paper

  • Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) · Inferring emotional state by combining text, audio, and visual information
  • Proxy · An auxiliary representation built from other signals to stand in for missing or corrupted information
  • Gated residual correction · A method that gradually updates a value by adding controlled correction terms, guided by a gate that decides how much to change
  • Reliability score · An estimated value between 0 and 1 indicating how trustworthy the observed text representation is
  • MAE, F1, Acc · Evaluation metrics: prediction error size, balanced classification score, and accuracy respectively

Original abstract (English)

Multimodal sentiment analysis aims to infer affective states by integrating language, visual, and acoustic cues. However, real-world multimodal inputs are often incomplete or corrupted, which can weaken cross-modal complementarity and introduce misleading information into downstream fusion. Existing proxy-based methods for incomplete MSA commonly rely on one-shot proxy construction to compensate for degraded language information, but the generated proxy may be coarse or unreliable at initialization. Prematurely injecting such a proxy into multimodal reasoning can propagate initial errors and compromise sentiment prediction. To address this limitation, we propose an iterative proxy correction framework for robust incomplete MSA. Our method constructs a language-oriented proxy from non-language modalities and progressively refines it under multimodal context through gated residual correction. The corrected proxy is then adaptively fused with the observed language representation according to an estimated language reliability score, allowing the model to balance proxy-based compensation and trustworthy linguistic evidence. In addition, we introduce a stage-wise latent correction objective that uses the complete language representation as a training-time semantic anchor to stabilize the proxy refinement trajectory. Extensive experiments on MOSI, MOSEI, and SIMS under diverse missing-modality settings demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently outperforms competitive baselines and achieves robust sentiment prediction under incomplete inputs.

Authors · Zhifa Geng, Subin Huang, Hao Guo, Junjie Chen, Sanmin Liu, Chao Kong

Read on arXiv

Latest papers

All papers →

Latest from METAL LAB

Figures: Zhifa Geng et al., arXiv:2608.19971, arxiv-nonexclusive