Towards general embodied intelligence: integrating large language models, knowledge bases, and reasoning capabilities to build the next generation of AI agents
Fig. 1: Schematic diagram of a unified multimodal large language model architecture.
TABLE I: Comparative Summary of Related Embodied Intelligence Review Articles
Authors
Year
Core Contributions
Limitations
Yao et al. [151]
2025
Reviews multimodal embodied intelligence tasks and models; explores LLM/MLM integration with robots; proposes PPA paradigm and evaluates MLMs.
Classical AI lacks physical interaction; DRL is data-hungry and less robust; VLN training is costly and generalization is poor; LLMs lack causal reasoning; Sim2Real transfer is weak; evaluation standards are lacking.
Dong et al. [135]
2025
Analyzes LLM-enabled Human-Robot Symbiotic Manufacturing (HRSM), including interaction, collaboration, and execution.
Privacy and data sensitivity risks; hallucination and bias in LLMs; absence of unified evaluation standards; integration difficulties in diverse environments; token length limits document processing.
Tan et al. [70]
2025
Proposes CEIM to fuse multi-source data and LLM reasoning for semantic integration and decision-making in customized manufacturing.
Data fusion issues; low semantic alignment; real-time control accuracy is lacking; high computation cost; insufficient standardization of AI-device interfaces.
Jeong et al. [59]
2024
Surveys five directions of LLM/VLM in robotics: reward design, control, planning, manipulation, and scene understanding.
Limited by embedded compute; weak sensor fusion; prompt bias and poor interpretability; lacks domain-specific knowledge; Sim2Real generalization is weak.
Wang et al. [68]
2025
Discusses LLMs in robotics tasks and evaluates GPT-4V; explores future applications in agriculture and medicine.
Plan robustness is lacking; long prompts require expert input; fixed action sets reduce flexibility; API is closed-source; RGBD-based 3D reasoning is limited.
Our Survey
2025
Systematically analyzed the synergy among LLMs, knowledge bases, reasoning capabilities, and embodied intelligence; proposed a unified framework and five future directions for GEI.
Limited empirical examples; insufficient discussion on multilingual settings and real-world deployment.
Fig. 2: Evolution and Taxonomy of Large Language Models.
TABLE II: Comparison of Research on Large Language Models (LLMs)
Author(s)
Core Improvement
Advantages
Application Scenarios
Cummins et al. [25]
Compiler optimization framework
Enhances disassembly processes
Compiler optimization
Hu et al. [174]
Prompting strategies incorporating context to enhance VQA performance
Fig. 11: Example diagram of the integration of embodied intelligence and large language model.
TABLE XI: Security and Robustness Challenges in Embodied LLMs
Authors
Year
Innovation
Advantages
Limitations
Liu et al. [5]
2025
Contextual backdoor attacks in LLM-based agents
Dual-modal triggers for covert actions
No defense strategy yet in real use
Zhang et al. [52]
2024
Investigated LLM-based robot jailbreak threats
Systematic exposure of jailbreak scenarios
No concrete safety mechanisms
Li et al. [92]
2024
Universal benchmarking interface for LLM agents
Fine-grained error taxonomy
No coverage of real multimodal scenes
Kovalev et al. [7]
2022
Reviewed LLM-based instruction planners without training
Works in zero-shot scenarios
Lack of real task validations
Szot et al. [12]
2023
LLaRP: RL-trained LLM policy with vision
Superior multi-task performance
Needs intensive training and environment
Leon et al. [84]
2024
Studied virtual agent personality effects in VR
Extrovert agents yield better experience
No embodiment in physical robots
Liu et al. [115]
2024
EIRAD dataset and BLIP2 for adversarial attack test
Reveals attack success in LLM agents
Evaluation mainly on textual input
Fig. 12: Embodied Intelligence, Large Language Model, Knowledge Base and Reasoning Ability together constitute the core architecture of the intelligent system.
TABLE XII: Summary of Studies on LLM-driven Embodied Control
Authors
Year
Innovation
Advantages
Limitations
Ruaridh et al. [107]
2025
Proposed ELLMER framework combining GPT-4 with RAG for task planning in unpredictable environments.
Enables long-horizon task execution via visual/force feedback; adaptable planning.
Generalization scope not fully validated.
Fan et al. [56]
2024
Introduced LLM agents in manufacturing for autonomous design, planning, and control.
Achieved 81.88% task completion with GPT-4 in complex scenarios.
Challenges remain in 3D spatial task handling and real-time integration.
Liang et al. [62]
2023
Introduced “Code as Policies” using LLMs to write robot policy code from commands.
Enables reactive and trajectory-based control via few-shot prompting.
Limited physical-world validation.
Xu et al. [71]
2025
Reviewed LLM-integrated CPSS frameworks for human-centered Industry 5.0.
Connects LLMs, perception, scheduling, and swarm intelligence into unified framework.
Lacks empirical task-specific evaluations.
Zhao et al. [134]
2024
Developed MultiBotGPT system using GPT-3.5 for UAV/UGV task execution.
Outperforms BERT in assignment success rate; improves operator experience.
Focused on limited command types and single-modal input.
Shen et al. [124]
2024
Discussed LLMs as foundation for embodied agents in physical environments.
Conceptual bridge from virtual to real-world through embodiment.
Lacks concrete framework or task-based implementation details.
Jiang et al. [78]
2024
Proposed KoMA: LLM-driven multi-agent system for autonomous driving.
Achieves robust decision-making via planning, shared memory, and reflection.
Complexity of real-world deployment and scalability remains a challenge.
The convergence of large language models (LLMs), structured knowledge bases (KBs), and reasoning ability (RA) presents a promising trajectory toward general embodied intelligence (GEI). This paper reviews the evolution of LLM-centered intelligent systems, emphasising their integration with knowledge representation, logical reasoning, and physical embodiment. We analyse LLM architectures, pre-training methods, and inference mechanisms, along with their interaction with external knowledge sources and structured reasoning frameworks. Furthermore, we examine embodied intelligence (EI) paradigms wherein agents learn and act in physical environments. To synthesise these dimensions, we present a conceptual framework that illustrates the synergy among LLMs, KBs, RA, and embodiment, serving as a guiding model for perception, reasoning, and action rather than an implemented engineering architecture. To advance toward GEI, we identify five key challenges: efficient LLM deployment, closed-loop knowledge integration, hybrid symbolic-neural reasoning, perception-action grounding, and continual learning. This survey provides a comprehensive roadmap for developing adaptive, multimodal agents capable of operating in complex, dynamic settings.