Are LLMs becoming similarly creative? Evidence from three years of models
三年数据显示,不同AI聊天机器人给出的答案正变得越来越相似
研究团队测试了2023年以来发布的68个AI模型,让它们回答需要创造力的问题,并测量这些答案彼此之间的差异程度。结果显示一个统计上显著的趋势:不同公司模型的回答随时间推移变得越来越相似。研究者警告,如果这一趋势持续,人们通过AI获得的创意想法范围可能会不断收窄。
他们做了什么
- 团队使用两套题目——经典心理学创造力测试Alternate Uses Task(要求为日常物品想出不寻常用途)和收集了100个真实用户问题的Infinity-Chat100——让来自12家公司的68个模型分别作答
- 把每个回答用句子嵌入模型转换成数字向量,再用余弦距离衡量回答之间的差异,并按发布时间分成九个区间做回归分析
- 只比较不同公司之间的模型(避免同公司模型因架构或训练数据相近而造成干扰),并通过1000次重复抽样检验结果,确保结论不受某一家公司模型过度代表的影响
- 在AUT测试中,不同公司模型回答之间的平均差异从最早约0.50降到最近低于0.40;在Infinity-Chat100上降幅较缓,从约0.34降到0.32,且1000次重复抽样结果全部显示下降趋势

| Dataset | Models (Pairs) | Slope per Bin | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternate Uses Task | 68 (273) | −0.01385 | [−0.01695,−0.01044] |
| Infinity-Chat | 67 (268) | −0.00167 | [−0.00267,−0.00074] |

| AUT | Infinity-Chat100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Observed | Missing | Observed | Missing |
| minimax/minimax-01 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 100 |
| minimax/minimax-m1 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 100 |
| mistralai/mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct | 10 | 0 | 89 | 11 |
| qwen/qwen3.6-max-preview | 2 | 8 | 100 | 0 |
| qwen/qwen3-max | 10 | 0 | 94 | 6 |
| meta-llama/llama-3.2-3b-instruct | 10 | 0 | 97 | 3 |
| anthropic/claude-fable-5 | 10 | 0 | 99 | 1 |
| minimax/minimax-m2.1 | 10 | 0 | 99 | 1 |
| qwen/qwen-2.5-72b-instruct | 10 | 0 | 99 | 1 |
| All 69 models | 668 | 22 | 6,677 | 223 |

为什么重要
如今AI聊天机器人每天处理数十亿条消息,其中大量用于构思创意和写作,如果不同AI给出的答案越来越趋同,人们接触到的想法多样性可能会缩小。这对未来能否继续依赖AI作为创意合作伙伴提出了值得关注的警示。

本文术语
- Alternate Uses Task(AUT) · 一种心理学测试,通过要求为常见物品想出不寻常用途来衡量发散性思维
- Infinity-Chat100 · 收集了100个真实用户向AI聊天机器人提出的开放式问题的数据集
- 句子嵌入(sentence embedding) · 把文本转换成能表示其含义的数字向量的方法,方便进行数学比较
- 余弦距离 · 衡量两个向量(此处指两个回答)含义差异程度的指标,数值越小表示越相似
- 跨公司比较(cross-family) · 只比较不同公司生产的模型,而非同一公司内部的模型
论文原文摘要(英文)
Many benchmarks track Large Language Model (LLM) performance on tasks with verifiable answers, but less is known about how LLM performance is evolving on open-ended tasks, where creativity, originality and diversity may matter as much as quality. As LLMs increasingly support human ideation and creative work, understanding trends in LLM performance on open-ended tasks is critical. This paper presents a preliminary analysis of LLM creative outputs spanning three years of model releases, examining model responses to Infinity-Chat100, a real-world collection of open-ended user queries, and the Alternate Uses Task, an established psychometric creativity assessment. Using sentence-embedding similarity, we examine trends in LLM responses to these prompts. Our findings show a statistically significant decrease in model output diversity over time, suggesting that LLM outputs may be converging in creative substance across models. If this trend persists, LLM-driven homogenization may progressively diminish human agency in human-AI co-creative work, demanding careful consideration of LLMs' role in the human creative process.
在 arXiv 阅读最新论文
- LoRA-GA$^2$: Low Rank Adaptation with Multi-step Gradient Adaptive Alignment在正式微调前先偷看几步训练的梯度,让LoRA的初始化更聪明
- Remember, Verify, or Ask? Cross-Family Evaluation of Memory Commitment in LLM AgentsAI助手在该向你提问的时候,却更愿意自己去核实事实
- Robust Incomplete Multimodal Sentiment Analysis via Iterative Proxy Correction文本信息缺失或损坏时,这个AI不靠一次性猜测,而是反复修正猜测结果,从而更准确地判断情绪
- Generating Diverse Personas for User Simulators to Test Interview Dialogue Systems要测试访谈式对话系统需要大量不同性格的虚拟用户,这项研究用大语言模型自动生成这些虚拟用户人设
- Rethinking Patch Based Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Semantic Structured Partitioning别再机械切分时间序列,按语义把它切成有意义的块
- Reliable Financial Named Entity Recognition under Domain ShiftAI在正式文件里学到的自信,一到推特上就变得不可信
- Bringing analytic rigor to agentic AI for science: The Brain Researcher platform for neuroimaging data analysis让AI分析脑影像数据时,把“为什么这个结论可信”也一并记录下来
- GenMatch: An End-to-End Generative Matching Framework for Micro-View Order-Dispatching in Ride-Hailing滴滴把打车派单从预测-计算-匹配三段式流程改成一次生成完成,线上效果提升明显
METAL LAB 最新报道
图片来源: Nirav Patel et al., arXiv:2608.19437, CC BY 4.0