Do Audio Language Models Use Paralinguistic Evidence? Counterfactual Audits for Response Evaluation
arXiv:2608.06718v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Audio-language models (ALMs) are increasingly used as judges for speech-to-speech systems, but a judge that receives audio may not actually use paralinguistic evidence. We introduce counterfactual audits for paralinguistic response evaluation. Each audit item holds the transcript fixed while varying affect, prosody, or the timing of an affective shift, forcing a valid judge to track the audio cue rather than lexical content or response style. We ev
arXiv에서 원문 보기