Factorized Hypothesis Search for Evidence-to-Taxonomy Retrieval
arXiv:2608.06614v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large-taxonomy retrieval often assumes that the input already expresses the target concept. In many settings, however, the input is indirect evidence, such as a table cell whose meaning depends on its row, column, datatype, and context. We call this mismatch the retrieval readiness gap. Our analysis shows that the current index retrieves the target reliably when its semantics are explicit, while raw evidence often leaves it deep in the ranking. We
arXiv에서 원문 보기