Can Conversational AI loosen Us-Versus-Them Boundaries? The Effects of Common, Dual, and Separate Identity Framings on Pro-Immigrant Intergroup Helping

arXiv:2608.192202026-08-21

和AI聊天机器人对话五轮,白人美国人对拉丁裔移民的归类和帮助意愿都发生了变化

研究团队让658名非拉丁裔白人美国成年人与GPT-4o进行五轮对话,测试AI是否能改变他们对拉丁裔移民的心理归类和支持意愿。当聊天机器人强调'我们都是美国人'的共同身份,或'既是拉丁裔又是美国人'的双重身份时,参与者把移民视为'另一群体'的倾向降低,帮助移民的意愿也随之上升。不过,这种转变对实际行为和多元化信念本身的直接影响并不显著,说明认知变化与行为改变之间仍存在差距。

论文原文摘要（英文）

Rising immigration has intensified intergroup tensions in many countries. Traditional bias-reduction programs remain difficult to scale and increasingly constrained by U.S. policy. This preregistered experiment tested whether conversational AI can shift how majority-group members categorize and relate to Latine immigrants. Drawing on the common ingroup identity model, a quota-representative national sample of 658 non-Latine White U.S. adults completed five rounds of dialogue with a LLM (GPT-4o). The model was instructed to frame Latine immigrants in terms of a common ingroup identity (a shared American identity), a dual identity (both Latine and American), or a separate identity (distinct cultural boundaries), or to discuss an unrelated topic in a control condition. The manipulations altered categorization: relative to control, common ingroup identity and dual identity conversations lowered separate categorization, and dual identity conversations raised dual categorization. Although direct effects on behavior and pro-diversity beliefs were nonsignificant, willingness to act was significantly higher in the conditions emphasizing a superordinate identity (common ingroup and dual identity). A path model further revealed indirect associations: both conditions reduced separate categorization, which in turn correlated with greater willingness to act. Semantic similarity analyses of the transcripts confirmed that conversations tracked their assigned narratives; participants' convergence with shared-identity language related positively, and with separate-identity language negatively, to willingness to act. These effects were largely consistent across moderators (need for closure, openness to experience, and political orientation). The findings show that brief AI conversations can loosen us-versus-them boundaries while underscoring the gap between cognitive recategorization and behavior.

作者 · Oluwadamilola Jeboda, John F. Dovidio, Jonas R. Kunst