Different Facets of Verbalised Overconfidence: an Interpretability Study
Large language models tend to overconfidence, giving assertive answers when the evidence suggests hedging or abstention. Using controlled reasoning scenarios that manipulate logical necessity and possibility, we study this behavior in Qwen3-4B, across three ways to express uncertainty: verbal epistemic markers, abstention, and numeric confidence scores. Our results confirm this tendency toward overconfidence, particularly when the model is prompted
在 arXiv 阅读最新论文
- FinRCA-Bench: Benchmarking Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning for Financial AI SystemsAI经常能说对财务对账出错的原因,却拿不出真正的证据
- Looped Language Models Improve Compositional Tool Calling会反复回想自己答案的AI模型,更擅长按顺序组合调用多个工具
- FACET: Preserving Source Intent and Executable State in Terminal Task SynthesisFACET:让终端命令行任务的“说明书、环境、答案、判分器”自动保持一致
- FM-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Management with Competing Agents让AI连续管理一家足球俱乐部20年后发现,胜负关键不在模型大小,而在经营习惯
- Bridging Search and CRM: Productionizing AI Product Research Agents for Customer Re-EngagementAI智能体追着离场用户发WhatsApp,把逛而不买的顾客拉回来
- Adversarial Review: Structured Disagreement for Grounded Agentic Code ReviewAI代码审查:与其堆更多智能体,不如让一个审查者和一个批评者互相较真
- GenEx: A Graph-Based Representational Paradigm for SARS-CoV-2 Variant Detection via Codon Co-occurrence Networks把病毒基因序列变成密码子关系网络图,用来区分新冠变异株
- Alignment Is All You Need: Instruction-Free Training for General Audio-Language Models语言模型全程冻结,只训练一个小连接器,也能做出好用的听觉理解AI